前TVB藝員袁彌明宣佈參選下屆立法會,代表人民力量競逐新界東識席。看她的參選宣言,把因為參政的決定跟男友分手、當年與無線的合約糾紛也拿出講,有點騎呢,但她的思路清晰、理念清楚,又極有conviction,還的的確確為此放棄了美國公民權(如她所強調:是美國護照,不是綠卡!)--雖然報導說她開著市值百萬的Lexus去美國領事館,無論如何都其志可嘉。但她在選舉名單上排在慢必之後,同區還有票源相近的三屆議員長毛,勝算不高,不過起碼已獲得我這一票!
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Revisiting The Decision to use the Atomic Bomb
Soon there will be another anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. People will again trot out the hoary argument that the bomb saved a million lives by making an invasion on the Japanese mainland unnecessary.
I've been re-reading Gar Alperovitz's 1995 book, "The Decision to use the Atomic Bomb", which examines the events leading up to Hiroshima and Nagasaki in great detail, and concludes that it was not necessary to drop the two bombs that ultimately killed between 2-300,000 innocent civilians in order to end the war. He states that the Japanese army was, by July 1945, on the verge of collapse, and that the emperor had already made moves to the Russians to surrender. The only issue keeping the Japanese from surrendering is the Allies' insistence on "unconditional" surrender without giving assurance that the Emperor will remain on the throne. With the Nuremberg trial about to start, many Japanese were afraid that the Emperor will be tried as a war criminal and even be executed, and so were ready to fight to the death to defend him.
As it happened, keeping the Emperor was exactly what the Allies did, in order to preserve stability, but in drafting the Potsdam declaration, American Secretary of State James Byrnes specifically removed any assurances for the Emperor. This was because one day before the Potsdam Conference, the Americans had successfully tested the atomic bomb, and were determined to use it. At the same the Russians strung the Japanese along with the hope of a mediated peace to buy time to move their troops east.
Alperovitz argued that the Soviet declaration of war and invasion of Manchuria on 9 Aug 1945 was the decisive factor in the Japanese surrender, since it cut off the country's main supply line and made the continuation of war all but impossible. Indeed, with the dropping of the first bomb on 6 Aug and the Soviet invasion on 9 Aug, it was hard to see why it was necessary to drop the second bomb on Nagasaki on 9 Aug. If the main objective was to force Japanese surrender, why not give them a day or two to respond to these events?
The answer could only be that the bombs were not used as instruments to stop the war but to start another one--the Cold War. Hundreds of innocent civilians died in order to scare the Russians. What folly!
I've been re-reading Gar Alperovitz's 1995 book, "The Decision to use the Atomic Bomb", which examines the events leading up to Hiroshima and Nagasaki in great detail, and concludes that it was not necessary to drop the two bombs that ultimately killed between 2-300,000 innocent civilians in order to end the war. He states that the Japanese army was, by July 1945, on the verge of collapse, and that the emperor had already made moves to the Russians to surrender. The only issue keeping the Japanese from surrendering is the Allies' insistence on "unconditional" surrender without giving assurance that the Emperor will remain on the throne. With the Nuremberg trial about to start, many Japanese were afraid that the Emperor will be tried as a war criminal and even be executed, and so were ready to fight to the death to defend him.
As it happened, keeping the Emperor was exactly what the Allies did, in order to preserve stability, but in drafting the Potsdam declaration, American Secretary of State James Byrnes specifically removed any assurances for the Emperor. This was because one day before the Potsdam Conference, the Americans had successfully tested the atomic bomb, and were determined to use it. At the same the Russians strung the Japanese along with the hope of a mediated peace to buy time to move their troops east.
Alperovitz argued that the Soviet declaration of war and invasion of Manchuria on 9 Aug 1945 was the decisive factor in the Japanese surrender, since it cut off the country's main supply line and made the continuation of war all but impossible. Indeed, with the dropping of the first bomb on 6 Aug and the Soviet invasion on 9 Aug, it was hard to see why it was necessary to drop the second bomb on Nagasaki on 9 Aug. If the main objective was to force Japanese surrender, why not give them a day or two to respond to these events?
The answer could only be that the bombs were not used as instruments to stop the war but to start another one--the Cold War. Hundreds of innocent civilians died in order to scare the Russians. What folly!
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Focus on Film
最近幾個月經常為Focus on film教錄像班,這組織的對像是本地及國際學校的學生,通過為期四天的錄像訓練營,教導學生有關電影理論與拍攝技巧。跟其他我教過的錄像班的最大分別是訓練營集中在四天舉行,學生在短期內學習到有關知識並實踐,整個過程更連貫。此外他們有既定的劇本,並要求學生輪流擔當劇組不同崗位,令學生從實習中認識整個製作流程。
Focus on film打算在來年開辦更多錄像班,積極招攬導師。上個月我參加了他們的導師訓練日,並參與演出。
Focus on film打算在來年開辦更多錄像班,積極招攬導師。上個月我參加了他們的導師訓練日,並參與演出。
Friday, June 22, 2012
Ronan Farrow's sarcastic Father's Day tweet "Happy father's day -- or as they call it in my family, happy brother-in-law's day", caused headlines all over the world and reminded people once again of the scandal Ronan's biological father, Woody Allen caused when it was revealed that he was having an affair with his adoptive daughter Soon-yi, more than 20 years ago.
Before people once again pass judgment on whether Woody Allen's relationship was or is appropriate, they should consider these facts:
1. Woody and Mia lived in separate apartments throughout their relationship.
2. Soon-yi's last name is Previn, and her father is conductor Andre Previn.
3. Woody Allen wrote, directed and starred in one film a year throughout most of his career. As any filmmaker can tell you, that doesn't leave much time for family obligations.
4. Woody Allen and Soon-yi have been together for more than 20 years and have been married since 1997. Their relationship has stood the test of time, and is evidently mutually satisfying.
5. Woody Allen and Soon-yi have adopted children of their own. They have obviously passed any required psychological screenings and home visits and are deemed to be able to provide nurture and support to children.
I remember reading that Soon-yi is somehow intellectually impaired. I now think this may be disinformation purposely put out during Woody Allen's bitter custody battle with Mia Farrow, because Soon-yi has a masters degree from Columbia University. Speaking of intelligence, Ronan is considered a child prodigy, a Rhodes scholar who graduated from law school at the age of 21, and now works under Hillary Clinton in the States Department. Given the growing evidence that intelligence is inherited, Mr. Farrow should be thankful for the genes passed on to him by his father (because, let's face it, even though Mia Farrow is a terrific actress, a well respected humanitarian and a great mother who raised 9 kids, Woody Allen is a genius), instead of bearing a grudge for 20 years. At the very least, it might save him a ton in shrink bills.
Before people once again pass judgment on whether Woody Allen's relationship was or is appropriate, they should consider these facts:
1. Woody and Mia lived in separate apartments throughout their relationship.
2. Soon-yi's last name is Previn, and her father is conductor Andre Previn.
3. Woody Allen wrote, directed and starred in one film a year throughout most of his career. As any filmmaker can tell you, that doesn't leave much time for family obligations.
4. Woody Allen and Soon-yi have been together for more than 20 years and have been married since 1997. Their relationship has stood the test of time, and is evidently mutually satisfying.
5. Woody Allen and Soon-yi have adopted children of their own. They have obviously passed any required psychological screenings and home visits and are deemed to be able to provide nurture and support to children.
I remember reading that Soon-yi is somehow intellectually impaired. I now think this may be disinformation purposely put out during Woody Allen's bitter custody battle with Mia Farrow, because Soon-yi has a masters degree from Columbia University. Speaking of intelligence, Ronan is considered a child prodigy, a Rhodes scholar who graduated from law school at the age of 21, and now works under Hillary Clinton in the States Department. Given the growing evidence that intelligence is inherited, Mr. Farrow should be thankful for the genes passed on to him by his father (because, let's face it, even though Mia Farrow is a terrific actress, a well respected humanitarian and a great mother who raised 9 kids, Woody Allen is a genius), instead of bearing a grudge for 20 years. At the very least, it might save him a ton in shrink bills.
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Speechless review on Polari Magazine
(from http://www.polarimagazine.com/filmtvreviews/speechless)
A really well-written and objective review of Speechless:
A really well-written and objective review of Speechless:
Last night saw the international premiere of Simon Chung’s third feature, Speechless, at
the BFI 26th London Lesbian and Gay Film Festival. It’s notable for a
Chinese film with a gay theme that it was filmed (and is set on) the
mainland, straying beyond the usually safe boundaries of Hong Kong
Island. It’s a film of two halves, beginning as a slow-burning
mystery-cum-romance before turning into a love-triangle thriller, but it
doesn’t really manage to pull off making those parts into a cohesive
whole.
A naked Westerner walks into a river and
is washed up on the banks of a nearby town. The police take him in but
he refuses to speak, or is incapable of speech. Eventually they transfer
him to the local hospital where he is befriended by Jiang, a handsome
young nursing assistant, who brings him home-made steamed buns, and a
tentative friendship develops.
Before the silent foreigner can be
transported to a mental institution Jiang helps him escape and takes him
into the countryside where they visit the places Jiang spent his
childhood. They begin to unlock things in each other, and this leads
them back into how Luke, as we discover the foreigner is called, came to
the decision to drown himself.
A French exchange student, Luke started
an affair with Han who, along with his girlfriend Yun, is a member of a
local Chinese Christian church. When Yun discovers what Luke and Han are
up to she takes it upon herself to expose Han publicly and humiliates
him to the point of suicide. The director cleverly tells this back-story
from Yun’s point of view first before revealing the whole picture.
Unfortunately this requires an overlong flashback that disrupts the
narrative drive, already dislocated by the change of pace and tone once
the more melodramatic thriller elements are brought in. The plot becomes
somewhat overwrought and the young actors are just not strong enough to
carry it.
The ending of the film is deliberately
ambiguous and raises more questions than it answers about both the
characters’ relationships and the relationship between China and the
West. Luke’s attitude to his relationship with Han is different because
he’s more relaxed about being gay and it’s as if the fact of Luke’s
nationality is a deliberate strategy to contrast those attitudes, but
also to examine what can happen when cultures with varying degrees of
acceptance try to come together.
The film suffers along with its characters insomuch as the difficulties of communication are not just verbal ones.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
钟德胜:爱到尽后是无言
(From http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/simon-chung)
【壹周影讯:第45期】钟德胜:爱到尽后是无言 【一周亮点】
在中国电影工业迎来井喷发展的今天,华语同影仍然是死水一潭,与十年前相比不见多少起色。广电局的内容审查制度已经影响到内地一代导演的创作能力,而港台 电影工作者在北上后又大多为商业利益所挟持,不得不在题材上自我阉割。正因为这样的背景环境,我们对那些经历寂寞仍坚守自我的华语导演总是由衷的敬佩;对 他们的同志作品探索,总是给予包容和不遗余力的推荐——因为来之不易,所以需要珍惜。
来自香港地区的钟德胜(Simon Chung)无疑就是上面说的那样一位导演(事实上香港近年来仍在创作同志电影的只有云翔、钟德胜以及年轻的新人洪荣杰)。钟德胜从1996年入行到现在 拍摄的全部为同志题材。最开始是一些收获好评的短片,如“别乡”、“史丹利”和“心灰”;之后在2005年他推出了长片处女作“只爱陌生人” (Innocent),该片获得多伦多泛亚国际电影节的最佳剧情片奖。2009年他的第二部作品“爱到尽”(End Of Love)入围第59届柏林电影节的全景单元。而在“爱到尽”过去3年后,他终于带来了自己的第三部剧情长片:“无言”(Speechless)。
“无言”的故事发生在中国的南方边城。年轻的法国交换生路克在偏僻的河岸被发现时全身赤裸,醒来后处于失语和失忆状态中,但他对医院的男看护小江感到莫名 的亲切。当地派出所准备把路克送往大城市的精神病院做心理测试,但小江最终以调理身体的理由说服了大家,把路克接到舅舅家里暂住。尽管路克想不起发生了什 么,但小江在与他的相处中误打误撞的发现,原来路克的无言是因为一位叫做韩的男子,而当记忆还魂,带来的真相却是生命不能承受之轻…
对不少中国人来说,西方世界仍是自由的旗帜,不管那自由是一种能让我们享受的权利,或只是意味着我们将免于受困。对韩和小江这两个为路克倾倒的中国人而 言,路克代表的也许只是一个可让自己从平庸生活中逃脱的机会。然而生活在这个世代,一走了之的想法显得那么遥远。最关键的是,受西方思想熏陶的路克,对同 性恋和爱情的看法和我们并不尽然相同。“无言”不仅讲述爱可跨越性别,更是告诫我们爱亦如梦如露般短暂。路克的逢场作戏给他带来了苦果,而能否珍惜当下所 爱,更是未知之数。相爱很难,不如紧闭双眼。
“无言”是钟德胜导演第一部在内地取景的电影,起用的演员包括法国新人Pierre-Mathieu Vitali,香港女演员俞融蓉,以及大陆新锐模特高崎纶。在年初的香港独立影展特别亮相后,“无言”现正在伦敦的第26届同志电影节放映。而电影的国际 发行权早早由德国发行公司Pro-Fun获得,预计将在今年秋天发行。
【壹周影讯:第45期】钟德胜:爱到尽后是无言 【一周亮点】
在中国电影工业迎来井喷发展的今天,华语同影仍然是死水一潭,与十年前相比不见多少起色。广电局的内容审查制度已经影响到内地一代导演的创作能力,而港台 电影工作者在北上后又大多为商业利益所挟持,不得不在题材上自我阉割。正因为这样的背景环境,我们对那些经历寂寞仍坚守自我的华语导演总是由衷的敬佩;对 他们的同志作品探索,总是给予包容和不遗余力的推荐——因为来之不易,所以需要珍惜。
来自香港地区的钟德胜(Simon Chung)无疑就是上面说的那样一位导演(事实上香港近年来仍在创作同志电影的只有云翔、钟德胜以及年轻的新人洪荣杰)。钟德胜从1996年入行到现在 拍摄的全部为同志题材。最开始是一些收获好评的短片,如“别乡”、“史丹利”和“心灰”;之后在2005年他推出了长片处女作“只爱陌生人” (Innocent),该片获得多伦多泛亚国际电影节的最佳剧情片奖。2009年他的第二部作品“爱到尽”(End Of Love)入围第59届柏林电影节的全景单元。而在“爱到尽”过去3年后,他终于带来了自己的第三部剧情长片:“无言”(Speechless)。
“无言”的故事发生在中国的南方边城。年轻的法国交换生路克在偏僻的河岸被发现时全身赤裸,醒来后处于失语和失忆状态中,但他对医院的男看护小江感到莫名 的亲切。当地派出所准备把路克送往大城市的精神病院做心理测试,但小江最终以调理身体的理由说服了大家,把路克接到舅舅家里暂住。尽管路克想不起发生了什 么,但小江在与他的相处中误打误撞的发现,原来路克的无言是因为一位叫做韩的男子,而当记忆还魂,带来的真相却是生命不能承受之轻…
对不少中国人来说,西方世界仍是自由的旗帜,不管那自由是一种能让我们享受的权利,或只是意味着我们将免于受困。对韩和小江这两个为路克倾倒的中国人而 言,路克代表的也许只是一个可让自己从平庸生活中逃脱的机会。然而生活在这个世代,一走了之的想法显得那么遥远。最关键的是,受西方思想熏陶的路克,对同 性恋和爱情的看法和我们并不尽然相同。“无言”不仅讲述爱可跨越性别,更是告诫我们爱亦如梦如露般短暂。路克的逢场作戏给他带来了苦果,而能否珍惜当下所 爱,更是未知之数。相爱很难,不如紧闭双眼。
“无言”是钟德胜导演第一部在内地取景的电影,起用的演员包括法国新人Pierre-Mathieu Vitali,香港女演员俞融蓉,以及大陆新锐模特高崎纶。在年初的香港独立影展特别亮相后,“无言”现正在伦敦的第26届同志电影节放映。而电影的国际 发行权早早由德国发行公司Pro-Fun获得,预计将在今年秋天发行。
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Turin
I was in London just last month, and Turin, by comparison,
seemed almost provincial. The metropolitan area is quite spread out, but the
historical centre is very compact and all the main sights can be visited on
foot. I didn’t really start to enjoy myself until the day I rented a bike and
went riding along the River Po. The weather was fantastic—sunny but not too
hot, and the ride, through the river bank and parks, was very scenic.
At the festival, I kept mostly to myself, not out of shyness or melancholy,
but because I was so involved with my new script. Alone in a foreign city, I
had few distractions, and the ideas started to flow more easily. Seeing one of
two gay films a day was also very inspirational, perhaps because all gay films
share a certain subversiveness and an impulse to explore forbidden desires. I
wrote more in one week than I did in the past 3 months. As a result I missed
most of the festival parties, even skipping out on the closing night party, no
doubt offending my hosts in the process. But when the muse calls, you don’t
tell her to come back later, after the party!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



