Thursday, February 25, 2010

My anti-smoking rant


The problem about travelling in China is, of course, the Chinese—yes, those incessantly smoking, spitting, littering, loudly talking, pinky fingernail growing people who inhabit this country. Okay, I could ignore the spitting, step over the trash, put on my earphones to block out the chatter and look the other way when confronted with those ugly, yellow fingernails, but I can’t very well stop breathing. Yet smokers are everywhere in China, lighting up whenever they wish—on the streets, in parks, restaurants, hotel rooms, shopping malls, train stations, even on buses.

I had a hellish time on a recent trip traveling on a cramped bus from Changsha to Shauguan in Guangdong. The trip was over five hours, with frustrating traffic jams caused by many road accidents along the way (bad Chinese drivers?) And people were constantly smoking. In a crowded bus with all the windows closed. At one point, as the guy in front of me lit up, I abruptly stood up and reached over to open the window beside him. “Hey, I’ve got a kid here,” he protested. Indeed, he was carrying a baby in his arms, who must be no more than four or five months old. “Then why are you still smoking?” I snapped. As a compromise, he kept the window open a crack, but finished his cigarette. He did not smoke again for the rest of the trip. But it’s incredible that this guy, a new father, was worried about a blast of cold, fresh air harming his child, yet completely indifferent to the second hand smoke he was blowing in his baby’s face every few minutes. Is he that stupid and ignorant?

Then I thought, maybe this is some kind of conspiracy—I mean, with its vast resources and its influential propaganda machine, surely the Chinese government could be doing a lot more to curb smoking, enforce no smoking laws (if they existed: there are no smoking signs in most public facilities, which people blithely ignore without consequences), educate people about the harmful effects of smoking, increase cigarette prices (at less than 5 yuan a pack, Chinese cigarettes are among the cheapest in the world), all of which have proven to be effective in reducing smoking in the rest of the world. So why hasn’t it? The answer has to be money. Assuming that about half of the adult male population and 5% of the female smoke, there are approximately 350 million smokers in China (according to WHO estimates), and if each smoke a pack a day at 5 yuan a pack, we’re talking about a 1.75 billion yuan a day industry, all of which state owned, which means that unlike in most countries where the government only earn a tax on tobacco sales, the Chinese state gets all of the 1.75 billion yuan a day in revenue.

Because health care has to be paid for by the individual in China, and most of the harmful effects of smoking do not show up until middle age, past the prime for most of the low-skilled workers who make up the labor force, the social costs of smoking is, for the government (as opposed to the smokers’ families), minimal. So the government can sit back and enjoy the financial bonanza that 350 million tobacco addicts bring. You can forget about Colombian cartels, Golden Triangle warlords, the Talibans, the Chinese government is the single largest drug pusher on the planet today. By creating an environment that makes it easy and socially acceptable to smoke (look at the fine examples that long tome smokers such as Mao and Deng have set), and by making tobacco affordable and readily available, China has the largest smoking population of any country in the world. According to statistics, half of the 350 million people will die preventable, premature deaths as a result of their addiction, more than the population of Japan and South Korea combined. And this does not include all the victims of second hand smoke that they bring down with them. Do I smell a class action negligence suit?

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

小城之春



這個新年去了四川跟編劇見面,順道做資料搜集,看看中國小城的風貌。

我住在編劇玉來的家,他母親每天弄的飯都很好吃。我還去了他親戚在農村的家,吃了兩頓豐富的農家飯--從沒吃過那麼鮮甜的青菜!那幾天的天氣很冷,屋內沒暖氣,睡覺時要蓋三張被。

回程時經湖南長沙到粵北的韶關,再坐五小時長途巴士回深圳。很有趣和難忘的一個旅程,也很累!

Monday, February 22, 2010

環保葬禮

新年流流,讓我講一個吉利的課題。
到了這個年紀,可以說是嗰頭近--也就是說預計壽命減現在歲數的數字比現在歲數小,所以開始要想一下死後臭皮襄的安排。一直以為火葬是必然之選,也是大部分身處地少人多的香港的人的選擇。但想深一層,火葬需要大量燃料(約180公升氣油,可以駕車一來一回香港與北京),還排放黑煙,而土葬花費高而且佔用太多地,最環保的方法是把屍體用可分解材料(或環保棺材包好),然後葬在樹林。
這方法在外地已開始流行,英國已有10%的死者採用環保葬禮。通常一間承辦公司會買下一塊樹林給安葬之用,地方不用很大(若每人分隔一米,一塊一平方公里的地已可安葬一百萬人),若在香港實行,很多不合住人的山地也可這樣利用。葬在這塊地等於資助保育樹林,當然不立墓碑,可以立一小塊牌紀念。不過我會選擇不做記認,只需埋了後種一棵樹,以後要紀念我只需在森林裡走走,在大樹下乘涼。
現在環保葬禮在外國才剛起步,香港社會比外國落後至少2-30年,對於葬禮這種中國習俗更可能根深蒂固,希望到我死之日可以實行環保葬禮吧!

Thursday, February 11, 2010

近期喜歡的廣告

最近很喜歡這廣告,creative一般,但executiion一流,casting、演出、分鏡都恰到好處,不知是那間廣告公司作品?


Friday, January 29, 2010

《呻吟透視》第廿五集:中國婦女的《完美生活》

香港人水平低早已不是新聞,但最可怕的是這些人可以擔當傳媒工作,把無知無限發放。像這個唐曉白的訪問,主持人竟可當著導演的臉說她的作品悶,簡直嘆為觀止,又說《甜美生活》「好過」許鞍華的...說來說去說不出電影名字,最後才由另一位主持補充說《天水圍日與夜》--是怎樣「好過」?因為沒那麼悶?

後來談及下岡,主持說文革已有這個名詞,唐曉白來不及反應就讓他胡混過去,後來話題又回到這個題目,他又說聽說過文革時人家離開城市的工作岡位叫下岡。天呀,那是下鄉呀!

Monday, January 25, 2010

安非他命與奧林匹克


Toilet Wall上,近日有人不斷出post讚「安非他命」,自吹自擂說入了柏林,又說「入圍咗柏林影展,就好似運動員入咗奧林匹克運動會咁,好犀利架喇」,我忍不住留了以下的回應,相信我最有資格說這話吧:
「你那麼落力出這麼多個post谷部戲,想必是和電影有關的工作人員吧(甚至是雲翔本人?)
不過請你不要散播一些錯誤的言論,貽笑大方不要緊,最怕是教壞細路!
首先入圍圍咗柏林影展跟運動員入咗奧林匹克運動會是兩回事,後者有很客觀的準則,要擊敗國內其他相同運動的選手才有資格代表國家參賽,參賽者必然是該國最快最高最好的人,但電影不同,沒有客觀的準則去量度.

當然入圍世界三大影展之一是一種榮幸,我也真心的恭喜你,但你也要知道這不代表「安」片是香港最好的電影,充其量只能說在香港2009年後半年拍成而又選 擇apply柏林影展的電影中,選片的幾位甚至一位人兄(在你的case其實只是Wieland一個人)認為這部片的質素與主題適合在那個section 放映,就是這樣一回事.

我這樣說沒有貶低你的意思,電影節選片人一年看那麼多電影,選中你那一部必然是因為在他眼中你的電影有過人之處,但過份自吹自擂只會得到反效果--你要知道這裡的人有多cynical.」

Saturday, January 23, 2010

罷看《孔子》


《孔子》導演胡玫接受訪問談《阿凡達》,說看完走出戲院「已經記不起故事」。哎吔,作為導演怎可以這樣小家子氣和沒風度,真係失禮死人。這還不止,她又說《阿》片故事是建基於虛幻虛假的情節上,跟自己的電影是兩個不同類型的戲種。但對《孔子》加入愛情線被認為不忠於史實,她又死撐道:「電影不是歷史教材,而是一項商業活動,適合的藝術加工可以理解。」這不是雙重標準麼?

對於《阿凡達》被迫令落畫以讓路給《孔子》,她又說:「不可能吧,這是商業社會,一切都是基於商業決定,你的電影好賣,斷不會下你的片,現今社會沒有理由有錢不賺的。」她認為是因為 2D版《阿》片賣座不理想,片商才有這樣決定。其實《阿凡達》2D版佔票房達四成,而且每個人都知道內地電影由製作至發行都是行政主導而非純商業行為,胡導演這樣指鹿為馬,佔了便宜又賣乖太令人反感,所以我決定不會看《孔子》。